Unpopular opinion, but why should it be the community's burden to save a company that takes in over $300m in revenue (and apparently spends every bit of it) eac

Unpopular opinion, but why should it be the community's burden to save a company that takes in over $300m in revenue (and apparently spends every bit of it) each year and, let's be real, hasn't managed to keep up or evolve along with the web? Why is it up to us to save them if they haven't really tried to save themselves? I love Mozilla -- as a concept -- and I want to live in a world where Mozilla and its products still exist. But I can't remember the last time I used Firefox. And yes, it's partially because I'm a Mac user, but it's also because I can't choose ideals over a superior product. That Mozilla languished on the desktop is sad, but almost understandable. IE languished too. (Microsoft was smart enough to replace it, even if the replacement did come years after it should have), but to languish on mobile is just inexcusable. Firefox Phone was a project that could have worked for certain markets for a very brief period of time, but they had to know they started too late and were going after an ever-shrinking market when they started. Sure, it would have been great for HTML5 to win over apps. It didn't happen. It's likely never going to happen (not until the next mobile paradigm shift happens anyway). But instead of focusing on building the ultimate browser -- desktop or mobile -- I don't know what Mozilla did. I really don't. But now they are struggling. And it puts the good work they do in jeopardy. And that's sad. But since when is it my responsibility (or yours) to subsidize a company with a $300m annual run rate who can't help itself. A company with very opaque goals and no roadmap. I'm all for saving Mozilla but it needs to show me it wants to be saved.