I was talking about changing the age-range to ~45-65 on the linked chart. Do you think that relative lifespan differences are still relevant at that age range?

I was talking about changing the age-range to ~45-65 on the linked chart. Do you think that relative lifespan differences are still relevant at that age range? I'd guess it'd have more to do with partner selection bias than male partners dying off more quickly, but I don't know.