4 ms·
The study states that they got accurate measurements once they started taking 5 drops of blood which is less than 0.1 ml. A blood sample could vary from 3-10 ml
by such_a_casual 11y ago
The study states that they got accurate measurements once they started taking 5 drops of blood which is less than 0.1 ml. A blood sample could vary from 3-10 ml according to the first thing I found on google. So it seems like all they have to do is take a few more drops to be accurate (which will still be an order of magnitude from the volume of traditional blood tests).
first thing on google: https://ethnomed.org/patient-education/blood/how-much-blood-is-taken-spanish-english https://ethnomed.org/patient-education/blood/how-much-blood-...
- danieltillett 11y agoTo get 100 µl out you need more than a finger prick. Once you go this way you might as well cannulate. There might be some special cases where you can get 100 µl but not 3 mL, but this market is not going to support the weight of a unicorn.
- such_a_casual 11y agoAre you claiming that 5 drops of blood cannot be obtained via finger prick?
- thescriptkiddie 11y agoIf he is, he's generally right. You get 1.5, maybe 3 drops out before it seals back up. Finger lancets are very tiny needles, even smaller than those used for insulin injections.
- replicatorblog 11y agoI worked in diabetes where finger stick tests are the lingua franca. 3 microliter sample sizes were common about 10 years ago for home use systems using relatively fine lancets. Using something just a bit larger would pretty easily get you 5 drops of blood.
- danieltillett 11y agoNot out of one - well not easily or consistently.