3 ms·
You are presuming it actually works for Valve, which is not an uncontroversial notion.
by jblow 11y ago
You are presuming it actually works for Valve, which is not an uncontroversial notion.
- jacques_chester 11y agoIt's controversial because we don't know if it would keep working without a massive free cashflow. (My guess is: it would not).
- jblow 11y agoThat is not even what I am talking about. I know a number of people who have quit Valve and almost all of them would cite organizational dysfunction as one of the top reasons for quitting. I don't know whether that is true -- I have never worked there -- and I don't wish to spread any ill rumors about Valve. I'm just saying that I know a bunch of people who have worked there who think the flat thing is one of Valve's biggest problems (another one being the incentive structure; of course these two things go hand in hand).
- jacques_chester 11y agoGotcha. I haven't worked there either; but I find the boosterism I sometimes observe to be annoying because of the confounding factor of massive free cashflow.