4 ms·
Flat systems value the accumulation of power over the actual work done. So if you are good at working the system, then you'll do fine. Otherwise, you have no pr
by sparkzilla 11y ago
Flat systems value the accumulation of power over the actual work done. So if you are good at working the system, then you'll do fine. Otherwise, you have no protection. Wikipedia is a good example of a flat system where people accumulate power in other ways, usually by banding with others to enforce a particular point of view. While the goal is ostensibly creating content, much of the time is taken up on power disputes that are not aligned with the goal of the organization. This political infighting leads inevitably to harassment of those who do not fit the system. In Wikipedia's case, minorities, women, and non-aggressive users find it difficult to gain power from the entrenched power groups, while those in power think nothing is wrong because they erroneously think the flat system gives everyone a fair chance. Combined with a lack of leadership, flat systems result in inefficient processes and inconsistent work compared to hierarchical systems where everyone knows their role and a leader guides the project, and has the final say.
- Avshalom 11y agoExcept every problem you just listed with flat systems is endemic in hierarchical systems too, to the same extent (including everyone in power thinking the system gives everyone a fair chance). Nothing about an org chart and formal channels of action has ever stopped politics and informal channels.