3 ms·
Obama looks, sounds, and acts presidential, and the disproof was in some way or another inadequate. The assertion was "Obama simply looks presidential", not "s
by mynameishere 19y ago
Obama looks, sounds, and acts presidential, and the disproof was in some way or another inadequate.
The assertion was "Obama simply looks presidential", not "sounds" or "acts". I displayed the portraits of ALL PRIOR PRESIDENTS, and NONE OF THEM LOOK LIKE OBAMA. Even if that as-perfect-as-humanly-possible disproof was somehow "inadequate", the proof in the first place was completely absent...only a bald declaration.
By "party mouths" I mean the "four legs good" people who do the talking. The left media has been falling over itself to kiss Obama's ass from Day 1 until the present--and I don't predict that will change. Clinton, by contrast, has been viewed quite negatively.
Would you feel the same about an Obama/Edwards ticket?
I don't see that happening. Edwards has already been an unsuccessful #2, and I don't think he would do it again.
What reason do you have to think that Romney won't be winning the nomination?
A gut feeling. The media, for reasons unknown, has been handling madman McCain very gently. You know, I'm just reading chicken entrails [1] here, don't you? It is pyschologically interesting to me how someone could utter "Obama looks presidential"...it is received wisdom, because there's no way a brain could derive such falsehood on its own. If I passed by Mitt Romney on the street, I'd probably think, "That guys looks like the VP in charge of operations at an auto parts factory". McCain looks like a retired security guard. Edwards looks just like a trial lawyer, of course.
But if I saw Obama, I might think, "That guy looks like a schoolteacher." That's what he looks like. To think he "looks presidential", you'd have to be pretty damn brainwashed.
[1] I mean, public declarations by candidates, coverage by the media, operations of the parties, etc, are all one or two or three steps removed from the truth. You have to guess at what's really happening...
- pius 19y agoThe assertion was "Obama simply looks presidential", not "sounds" or "acts". I displayed the portraits of ALL PRIOR PRESIDENTS, and NONE OF THEM LOOK LIKE OBAMA. Even if that as-perfect-as-humanly-possible disproof was somehow "inadequate", the proof in the first place was completely absent...only a bald declaration. What on earth are you talking about?
- mynameishere 19y agoIf you click on the "parent" link you can see the prior comments made by myself and others.