2 ms·
IMO sweeping dangerous features under the rug doesn't do anyone any good. Bring them out in the open, talk about why they are useful (or were in the past) and
by Klathmon 11y ago
IMO sweeping dangerous features under the rug doesn't do anyone any good.
Bring them out in the open, talk about why they are useful (or were in the past) and why they are dangerous, talk about what problem they were meant to solve at the time and what the better ways there are now to do it.
I'm not going to mourn the loss of `with` if it gets removed from the language, but i'm not going to shove my head in the sand and pretend like it doesn't exist either.