I hate when articles hide behind an invented "Twitter backlash", and then include 4-5 tweets with a handful of retweets. 6,000 tweets are sent every single seco

I hate when articles hide behind an invented "Twitter backlash", and then include 4-5 tweets with a handful of retweets. 6,000 tweets are sent every single second. You could build a narrative for anything with that logic. If your best example is a grammatically challenged tweet that racked up 4 favs and a retweet... you're probably inventing a controversy. Here's some insane examples from the first page of a Google News search for "Twitter Backlash": http://www.prweek.com/article/1372418/apple-faces-twitter-backlash-racism-allegation-australia-store http://www.prweek.com/article/1372418/apple-faces-twitter-ba... http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/ruby-rose-faces-backlash-twitter-6833436 http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/ruby-rose-faces-b... http://www.eonline.com/news/711079/raven-symone-angers-twitter-with-her-spring-valley-high-school-assault-comments http://www.eonline.com/news/711079/raven-symone-angers-twitt... http://www.her.ie/life/bloomingdales-forced-to-apologise-to-twitter-backlash-after-including-date-rape-message-in-christmas-catalogue/264317 http://www.her.ie/life/bloomingdales-forced-to-apologise-to-...