4 ms·
Announcing your gender is no [different ]than announcing that you're a student, that you're a teenager... But if the very definition of a "user" is around anon
by Ntrails 11y ago
Announcing your gender is no [different ]than announcing that you're a student, that you're a teenager...
But if the very definition of a "user" is around anonymity then by declaring a personal information you kind of are attempting to make the conversation about you (which I presume is contrary to the whole point of 4chan?).
I honestly don't know whether 4chan would pass the acid test of "is declaring gender indeed treated the same as declaring ones shoe size". If it did though (a big if) - I'd have a problem demonizing the behaviour. I guess that's the GP's contention?
So, is it acceptable to have a culture based around attacking (with real hostility) non-conformity to community norms? Where does one draw the line for when you can be mean to people on the internet?
My personal line comes when hostility starts leaking out of your community - but I'm happy to hear the other points of view.
- DanBC 11y ago> But if the very definition of a "user" is around anonymity then by declaring a personal information you kind of are attempting to make the conversation about you (which I presume is contrary to the whole point of 4chan?). we don't see the same level of hatred around people using tripcodes.
- Ntrails 11y agoI don't understand - can you elaborate? Googling suggests that a tripcode is essentially marking posts as being from a consistent source rather than any change to the poster themselves being annonymous? The question is if someone started posting on there about being tall - would there be vitriol? My guess is not but I really don't know.
- DanBC 11y agoA consistent source is not anonymous. It's linked to the trip code.