> who are approximately 0% trustworthy. I disagree with this. There are many routine driving situations where if someone else does something stupid, you're pro

> who are approximately 0% trustworthy. I disagree with this. There are many routine driving situations where if someone else does something stupid, you're probably dead. Given how many cars are on the roads, I'm amazed that there are as few accidents as there are. (I submit as anecdotal evidence: if you're reading this, then you're not dead.) Indeed, it is relatively uncommon for people to limit or reduce their driving on account of the risk of an accident. Accidents do happen, but for practical purposes most people round down the risk to zero. That said, I agree with your main point. If humnas are 99.99% trustworthy and automatic cars are 99.995% so, then it seems clear that we should allow them on the roads.