3 ms·
I don't disagree with your thesis, but: understanding a solution to a problem, and coming up with the solution are two vastly different things.
by LukeShu 11y ago
I don't disagree with your thesis, but: understanding a solution to a problem, and coming up with the solution are two vastly different things.
- tomerico 11y agoNot unlike P and NP
- jjbinx007 11y agoExactly. I always thought magic tricks exploited P vs NP... once you know how a trick done it seems obvious, but there are so many things to rule out before you find the right answer.
- visakanv 11y agoYes! It takes the Universe billions of years to produce a cow. It takes that cow less than a year to produce many more cows.
- sriku 11y agoWhile that's true, it's beside the point. In this case, it's all about finding and formulating the problem. The solution is the easier bit. Consider this - how many of us have crossed off "m" on both sides of m d^r/dt^2 = -GMm/r^2 without actually noticing the problem with that? We're equating "mass" as associated with inertia and "mass" as associated with producing the gravitational effect. This is the central point from which pretty much all of GR emerges.