3 ms·
Doubtful, I'd 86 this feature as a PM. Way too much complexity for too little benefit.
by fleitz 11y ago
Doubtful, I'd 86 this feature as a PM. Way too much complexity for too little benefit.
- gruez 11y ago86?
- ams6110 11y agoAmerican slang term meaning "get rid of" or "remove"
- chris_wot 11y agoHardly. You'd simply just keep the status of existing posts as anonymous and any posts after turning on the feature would show the posters real name.
- fleitz 11y agoI understand how to make the implementation work initially, however I would tell the client no we don't support that, and then wait for them to offer an amount of money to make it worthwhile. It's not hard, however, it complicates the software leading to subtle non-obvious bugs, and then you need to support this features with all the other features you're adding, etc. PS. What happens when they turn if off? ...and then back on? And then the 20 other subtle bugs that this feature introduces... And how many other features that lots of customers want are we delaying while we implement this? All this work for $24.95 a month... yeah... no, 86'd.
- chris_wot 11y agoI'd 86 the decision to purchase your software :-)