> You have it backwards: all of her personalities were blind, and then the sight returned for one of them. We are saying the same thing. Some of the personalit

> You have it backwards: all of her personalities were blind, and then the sight returned for one of them. We are saying the same thing. Some of the personalities are neurologically (not just psychologically) blind, some are not. That's a fascinating result, and certainly suggests that the different personalities are distinct not just psychologically but also at a far deeper level. > People with DID don't have multiple selves, they have no self at all It's not clear that your description and the article's are not the same, except for a preference for calling the same state "multiple selves" vs "no self." Both descriptions agree that something "shattered", and both agree that neurologically the split shards/personalities are remarkably distinct, on every level. I don't think there is a disagreement here.