You'd probably be better off linking to something like this: http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116 http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116 Or this: http://rifters.

You'd probably be better off linking to something like this: http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116 http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116 Or this: http://rifters.com/real/2009/01/iterating-towards-bethlehem.html http://rifters.com/real/2009/01/iterating-towards-bethlehem.... Less than a million neurons and Portia's interpreting complex visual scenes and making detailed attack plans. While "we only use 10% of our brains" is clearly bollocks, the implication that our brains may not be particularly efficient for our level of intelligence doesn't seem too unlikely given the way evolution works - our brain's a crudely scaled-up pile of accidental hacks guided by endless local maxima it can't readily escape from, it'd be very surprising if you couldn't improve on it. You might draw parallels with modern computers. All these transistors to play with, but we're certainly not using them as well as we could - we're limited by the software we want to run and know how to write using our existing tools.