Quite right -- in English law I guess it's all about the interpretation and determination of "consent" [0]: > 'A person consents if they agree by choice, and h

Quite right -- in English law I guess it's all about the interpretation and determination of "consent" [0]: > 'A person consents if they agree by choice, and have the freedom and capacity to make that choice'. An unfortunately interesting example where a small difference can have a major effect. I think I should have made it an opinion and said "should not" instead of "does not". Thought I can understand the argument that feeling deceived can also lead to anguish, so I understand where there was logic in the way it's been written in the UK (and perhaps also interpreted in the US). 0: http://content.met.police.uk/Article/Definitions/1400008450549/1400008450549 http://content.met.police.uk/Article/Definitions/14000084505...