3 ms·
I'm not sure whether we should use "addiction" and "lack of discipline" interchangeably. Ever since I was small, I've associated the former word with changes in
by hliyan 11y ago
I'm not sure whether we should use "addiction" and "lack of discipline" interchangeably. Ever since I was small, I've associated the former word with changes in brain chemistry that cannot be overcome with a regular dose of self-discipline (e.g. heroin addiction). If we can break it behaviorally, then isn't it a compulsion disorder of some sort?
- tremon 11y agoI don't think a solid line can be drawn between compulsion disorders and addiction. Both are reinforced by the reward mechanisms in the brain, and both can have (psycho)somatic effects that are hard to overcome with willpower alone. I would even guess that the lesser somatic addictions (e.g. cigarettes) are easier to overcome with willpower alone than compulsion disorders, but I have no actual experience or numbers to back that up.
- TeMPOraL 11y agoYou need to add "habits" to the equation as well. All of those things exhibit the same properties. We differentiate them by a mix of how many problems it causes for the person, for the person's surroundings, and various moral preconceptions about what one should do. Biochemical changes and responsiveness to raw willpower aren't really useful metrics, because both habits and addictions affect the brain, and the whole point of a good habit is to make something that's resistant to willpower.
- hliyan 11y agoI sort of agree. A decade's worth of force-of-habit could be as difficult as an addiction to break, but I'd be hard pressed to call it an addiction.
- corin_ 11y agoAddiction is generally defined as not being able to stop an activity that rewards you in someway despite the consequences. With drugs like heroin it's important to note the difference between chemical dependance and addiction. Chemical dependance can certainly cause addiction, but plenty of heroin addicts are (citation needed but I'm pretty sure) staying addicts because they want the high - which is the same principle as how people get addicted to gambling, or to weed (a drug that doesn't cause any physical dependance) - not because they are trying to keep withdrawal symptoms away. Of course, plenty of addicts do at some point want to quit and at that point the dependance can keep them addicted. Arguably the line between "addiction" and "lack of discipline" is subjective and arbitrary. It's possible to be a heroin addict, decide to never do it again, and... just do it. I've no personal experience but know it must be hell to try and do that, but it's absolutely possible. And former addicts, who no longer have any traces of the drug in their body, who have got past all the withdrawal... often relapse, for what you could call "lack of discipline". Equally, many people are addicted to gambling in ways that leave them losing all their savings, or addicted to weed in a way that they get nothing done in life because they're getting stoned all the time, or... For me, the line would be drawn based on how hard it would be to give it up, and how much damage is being done. If you're just annoyed that you spend too much time browsing the web, it probably shouldn't be called addiction. If you spend 95% of your time in the office browsing the web, and are concious that this is causing major problems for you, but still can't bring yourself to stop... addiction seems fitting.
- DanBC 11y agoPeople tend to talk about "dependence" and not "addiction", even for things that have a strong physical addiction, eg alcohol. An alcohol dependence means the person is preoccupied by alcohol, has a tolerance for alcohol, has a craving for alcohol, and will continue to use alcohol even though they know it's causing them harm. That definition can be applied to other things, especially some Internet things.