Does anyone have links to the original study(ies?) rather than just this summary? Some of these claims seem pretty hard to swallow. For example: > Who is on a

Does anyone have links to the original study(ies?) rather than just this summary? Some of these claims seem pretty hard to swallow. For example: > Who is on a team matters less than how the team members interact, structure their work, and view their contributions. This result appears to be strongly at odds with Google's thorough interviewing. Perhaps they are saying that the data doesn't show a difference based on individual history given the employee was good enough to be hired at Google, and assigned to the team in question by some other HR team? Any references would be appreciated. I tried searching Google Scholar for the author, but am finding nothing :/