3 ms·
> All those things are done better by others. It's highly debatable whether anyone does flickr "better". 500px, for example, have descended to suddenly announ
by rodgerd 11y ago
> All those things are done better by others.
It's highly debatable whether anyone does flickr "better". 500px, for example, have descended to suddenly announcing that they'll give away licenses for the photos you pay them to host and reward you with "exposure".
- porsupah 11y agoCould you expand on that? I'd be quite concerned to find my photos being licensed for commercial use without my consent.
- rodgerd 11y agoThe "Distribution Network" document, which was updated a month or so ago (https://licensing.500px.com/distribution/ https://licensing.500px.com/distribution/) under the "Content publishing partners". Sony, Google/chromcast, and Samsung all have the right to use your material uncompensated. There is an opt-out box buried away in your preferences, but (in a shitty move) you also have to opt out of selling your images through partners at the same time - you can't disable only uncompensated use.