4 ms·
I liked how they put the entirety of the infographic text in the alt text - really shows that they care about accessibility! I would have definitely liked thei
by ericjang 11y ago
I liked how they put the entirety of the infographic text in the alt text - really shows that they care about accessibility!
I would have definitely liked their thoughts on (2)-(5), and perhaps release some anonymized case studies from their 200 data points.
- deathanatos 11y ago> I liked how they put the entirety of the infographic text in the alt text - really shows that they care about accessibility! The alt text for the image is just "5 Keys to Google Teams"; if you open the image in a text-based browser (e.g., links), that is what you'll see. What they've set, the "title" attribute, is used for tooltips in graphical browsers; the replacement text comes not from title, but from alt. (And alt and title can be different.) From an accessibility standpoint, I'm not sure it really matters. The infographic's text is also above, in the bullet point, just in question form. (I actually question if the "info"graphic really adds anything. These seem like five independent things, not that 2 depends really on 1, which if the infographic implies anything, it would be that. 3 (goals are clear) certainly doesn't depend on 2 (get things done)…; if anything, having clear goals will lead to getting things done, but not the other way around.)