3 ms·
If that was confusing, all I'm recommending is to learn more about it for now, since he says he does not know much. My reasoning is that any technology that ca
by guscost 11y ago
If that was confusing, all I'm recommending is to learn more about it for now, since he says he does not know much.
My reasoning is that any technology that can produce an enormous amount of energy without burning hydrocarbons is worth more than a little consideration, even if it presents serious engineering and regulatory challenges, and especially to anyone who is concerned about carbon emissions.
- eggy 11y agoI agree, and I think regulatory is the key word with nuclear. Cost overruns and delays are due to the public's and government's ignorance on nuclear energy precipitating disproportionate regulations and hurdles. Nuclear, by far, represents the way forward if people could get over the irrational fears tied to the words "radiation" and "nuclear". It could be developed safely and less costly if we put up the resources. We need more nuclear physicists and engineers in the U.S. and the world.