3 ms·
For the record, here's the response to that article: http://www.dvorak-keyboard.com/dvorak2.html http://www.dvorak-keyboard.com/dvorak2.html
by j_baker 17y ago
For the record, here's the response to that article: http://www.dvorak-keyboard.com/dvorak2.html http://www.dvorak-keyboard.com/dvorak2.html
- wglb 17y agoSo are there any reliable studies that show 1) the superiority of one over the other or 2) the superiority of one over the other for programming?
- Semiapies 17y agoLast time I checked, there weren't any studies showing the superiority of the Dvorak layout that Dvorak himself wasn't involved with. What's the story on the "KEYTIME" study alluded to in the response above?
- zefhous 17y agoI don't know of any recent studies, haven't really looked, but I've been typing in Dvorak for about two years and this is my take on it. 1. I don't think the superiority of one or the other is really the issue here. The issue is making the switch. Those studies are addressing whether it's worth it to switch. The bottom line is that Dvorak is more efficient in terms of movement. It's optimized for typing in English (other romance languages are quite similar) and QWERTY just isn't. 2. From personal experience, I think that the mappings of punctuation are superior in Dvorak. I especially like having the dash and underscore easily accessible (next to Return) for programming. I also find punctuation more natural overall in Dvorak.
- photomatt 17y agoI've been typing Dvorak over 10 years now and more than anything I appreciate the comfort. Even though I type all day long I've never had a typing-related hand problem.