3 ms·
Depends entirely on the font. Would you make that same claim about Dancing Script or Tangerine? Or without getting that extreme - what do you consider serif fon
by Nadya 11y ago
Depends entirely on the font. Would you make that same claim about Dancing Script or Tangerine? Or without getting that extreme - what do you consider serif fonts to be? They emulate the tapir that writing by hand might have and are generally considered easier to read because of it.
I use Meiryo for Chinese/Japanese scripts and everything is simple, geometric shapes with more or less constant thickness for lines [0]. There are 100+ radicals (the name given to often used "parts" of Chinese characters) and so there is a lot more variation than the 26 (52 including capitals) that Latin alphabets use.
Korean hangul doesn't have this issue, because hangul is a wonderful, wonderful writing systems.
[0] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Meiryo_sample.svg/2000px-Meiryo_sample.svg.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Me...
- donatj 11y agoI actually find Hangul very interesting and beautiful.
- sevensor 11y agoHangul is the closest thing to a phonetic alphabet I'm aware of. Certainly more consistent than English in the Latin alphabet. Not that I know Korean, but I learned to sound out English loan words during the flight to Korea. It's that easy.