3 ms·
CS folks are not really used to upload their papers on the arXiv. So this is probably not a good indication of the number of papers published in each field.
by bnegreve 11y ago
CS folks are not really used to upload their papers on the arXiv. So this is probably not a good indication of the number of papers published in each field.
- jwcrux 11y agoAny good resources where CS folks typically upload their papers? I've used the Google/Twitter/etc. "published research" pages, but those are obviously company-specific.
- Ar-Curunir 11y agoIACR eprint for crypto, ECCC for complexity theory, though plenty of TCS people use arxiv too.
- seccess 11y agoMany CS researchers publish in conferences, not journals, so they tend to be pretty spread around. Each field usually has a major conference whose proceedings are worth looking into when they roll around. Of course, conference papers are behind paywalls, but you can usually find a free version if you search the authors/paper title in Google Scholar. The system could be better.
- LukeShu 11y agodl.acm.org won't have the paper uploaded if it wasn't published in an ACM journal or conference, but it has the metadata, including citations, for a huge number of papers published elsewere.
- mindcrime 11y agoCS folks are not really used to upload their papers on the arXiv. Maybe not to the same extent as physics people, but there is still a lot of CS on arXiv. More so in some subfields than others, but there's a pretty steady stream of CS papers showing up there. Enough that one person can't keep up with reading and digesting all of them as they appear. That said, I don't disagree that there's a lot more physics than CS on arXiv. :-) I'm just not sure if that's because CS people don't upload to arXiv, or because CS people publish fewer papers in general, or "other".