>dominance could be attributed to quality. The truth is that most children's books are "bad" I couldn't agree more. We get about ten to fifteen children's book

>dominance could be attributed to quality. The truth is that most children's books are "bad" I couldn't agree more. We get about ten to fifteen children's books a week from the library and I'm utterly amazed that most have been published. The ones that are part of a more common series are usually much better. The llama llama mad at mama sort of books. Dr Suess definitely falls into this higher quality bracket. Many times I have wondered if they spend more time writing the about author section then they do the book. I see this as a market that could use some serious improvement.