4 ms·

What is the point?

• thanatropism 11y ago
  The point is that the tradeoff between making things at optimal productivity and using thing-making as an educational opportunity exists. The OP's initiative may come at an excellent cost-benefit price, but it's questionable whether they even considered the tradeoff. And if they have, it's still important to discuss it if it comes to an internet forum.
  • geon 11y ago
    He already had the implementation ready, but choose to not push it to github in order to encourrage participation. Clearly, productivity was not a priority.
    • NiloCK 11y ago
      Today's productivity wasn't a priority for the author, but tomorrow's productivity is the goal. edit: A proverb: If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
  • deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]
  • camone 11y ago
    It was pointed out in the article and he did consider it. " Now, could I have finished it quicker and moved on my way if I’d just done it myself? Of course. But that’s not what it’s all about as an open source contributor. It’s fun delivering good software that helps other people, but also realize that there are tons of people out there who just don’t know where to get started. Some of you may be asking yourself, “what if I (and other lib users) don’t want to wait days for the feature?” From my experience, people are eager to try it out. At least one PR (sometimes several) is submitted, iterated on, and merged within a matter of a few hours. "