3 ms·
Could Einstein have justified his course of research as an attempt to incrementally innovate on some existing work?
by jamesrcole 11y ago
Could Einstein have justified his course of research as an attempt to incrementally innovate on some existing work?
- lmm 11y agoSure. "I'm trying to figure out a more consistent way of applying the Lorentz contraction" or something on those lines.
- jamesrcole 11y agoWhat chances would a person claiming that have had for getting funding? I guess what I'm trying to say is that the incentives are strongly biased to what can be easily seen as a increment on what has been done before, and that this is biased against work that may draw on what has been done before but is presenting a fairly different view to what is currently accepted. Could Darwin have presented his view as an incremental extension of some existing view? (I am aware there were existing theories of evolution, but there weren't any like Darwin's or Wallace's to be built upon).
- mannykannot 11y agoI think this is a good case for showing that the dichotomy is not particularly useful as the last word. Darwin was influenced by Malthus and Adam Smith, and also by Paley's watchmaker argument insofar as he sought to refute it, but his work was nothing short of revolutionary. Tenure with reduced teaching responsibilities is the way big thinking gets funded these days.
- sampo 11y ago> What chances would a person claiming that have had for getting funding? Einstein didn't get funding, i.e. an academic position. He did his initial groundbreaking work while having a day job in a patent office. He published his four groundbreaking papers in 1905 and was offered a lecturer position only on 1908.
- jamesrcole 11y agoI'm aware of that, the question was about the sorts of research that are likely to recieve funding.