> One is the old artistry argument, that the movie was shot and cut at 24 fps But (and correct me if I'm wrong) -- as I understand the article, the judder is a

> One is the old artistry argument, that the movie was shot and cut at 24 fps But (and correct me if I'm wrong) -- as I understand the article, the judder is an artefact of how 24fps is re-sampled to 60fps. The article didn't touch on it, but what does this look like in a cinema-presentation? The article seems to strive towards "60fps truth" (i.e. keep the judder), where "cinema truth" seems to be the relevant standard? Which display mode is more cinema-like?