3 ms·

Just tried, but seems not that different ---------------- PNG: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MassD/typeocaml_code/master/visualise_randomness/random_plot

Just tried, but seems not that different ---------------- PNG: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MassD/typeocaml_code/master/visualise_randomness/random_plot_time.png https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MassD/typeocaml_code/maste... ------------- JPG: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MassD/typeocaml_code/master/visualise_randomness/random_plot_time.jpg https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MassD/typeocaml_code/maste...

Ono-Sendai 11y ago
You have a very high quality JPEG in this case, even bigger than the PNG. So there aren't visible artifacts in this case. It's more of a general principle.
- jacksontale 11y ago
  ah ok, thanks.
- jacksontale 11y ago
  But anyway, I updated teh post, so people could be aware of this diff.