4 ms·
1. I am a programmer. 2. I was making a different point. Your example that references programming 101 is unrelated. 3. State and identity are distinct from on
by unclebucknasty 11y ago
1. I am a programmer.
2. I was making a different point. Your example that references programming 101 is unrelated.
3. State and identity are distinct from one point of view (yours, here), but not all possible points of view. Perhaps because you are a programmer, you are having difficulty seeing alternative interpretations.
4. I acknowledged my understanding of your point of view in my EDIT at least a day before you posted. However, you seemed to have overlooked that even while meticulously quoting my other statements and re-making your point with added snarkiness and pseudo-programmer elitism.
I get it. We all need a win sometimes. So, let's just say you've won and call it a day.
- gnaritas 11y agoNo, you don't get it, wasn't about winning, but whatever.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- unclebucknasty 11y agoJust read some of your other comments and found a very clear pattern. You have a strong tendency to put words in people's mouths, insist they mean one thing when they clearly state they mean another, omit their key points to make your own, and generally browbeat them over often narrow sub-points that you refuse to release. You appear to enjoy envisioning yourself to be superior, yet you seem to operate largely in a binary mode, and have great difficulty seeing shades of gray. So, the other person must be approached as a zero to your one (or vice-versa). I still enjoyed some of your comments, but that style makes it really tough to have a real discussion, as evidenced on this thread and many others where bewilderment and frustration are expressed over your "style". I hope you'll consider allowing others ownership of their own thoughts, opinions, and ideas, and trust that same actually are as expressed by them.