3 ms·

Have you abandoned vantage[1]? Why is this necessary? How is it different from vantage? [1]: https://github.com/dthree/vantage https://github.com/dthree/vantag

• fiatjaf 11y ago
  Answering myself: > Uh, wasn't this called Vantage? > Vantage was built upon what you now see as Vorpal. As Vantage evolved, it became apparent that its CLI base had great potential for use as a broader framework, and this did not need a lot of the overhead behind Vantage's client / server interaction. As a result, the CLI functionality was extracted out and Vorpal was born. Vorpal was made as slim as possible: 1/5th of Vantage's size. > Vantage is now an extension of Vorpal and inherits all of its functionality, while building in rich client / server features. In other word's, it's Vorpal with wings. https://github.com/dthree/vorpal/wiki/FAQ#uh-wasnt-this-called-vantage https://github.com/dthree/vorpal/wiki/FAQ#uh-wasnt-this-call...
  • dc2 11y ago
    :) As you put, the primary reason is that Vorpal has a broader scope by itself, though Vantage is still very powerful. Vorpal's already got a lot of cool use cases that wouldn't apply to Vantage, like this one: https://www.npmjs.com/package/itunes-remote https://www.npmjs.com/package/itunes-remote