4 ms·

There's always Platform for Privacy Preferences[0], which is kind of what you suggest, but specifically in the context of where the TOS/site policy talks about

There's always Platform for Privacy Preferences[0], which is kind of what you suggest, but specifically in the context of where the TOS/site policy talks about user identity/information. It ultimately ended up being more of a thorn in the side of server operators because, IMO, of the way Microsoft implemented the UI in IE's preferences (and that few other browsers actually honored it). [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P3P https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P3P

Zikes 11y ago
That doesn't sound quite right to me, as it's pitched as a system for web sites to implement individually to try to standardize user privacy systems. My suggestion is more along the lines of how a web site TOS works right now: it's going to be different for everyone, but it's accessible to the target and by continuing to serve content they implicitly agree to it and therefore are legally bound by it. If we're expected to read and agree to every single web site's TOS or face the consequences, it's only fair if the reverse is also true.