4 ms·

That's exactly true. But even GH Enterprise still has insane pricing. Hosting a git repo and a very very basic issue tracker is so not worth $2500/year. Not to

by x1024 11y ago

That's exactly true. But even GH Enterprise still has insane pricing. Hosting a git repo and a very very basic issue tracker is so not worth $2500/year. Not to mention that even this isn't a fixed price and it grows linearly with the number of employees. GitLab provides the same service for free. Well, at the cost of "you reading the manual and installing it on a VPS", which takes between "minutes" and "a couple of days" depending on how deep you want to go. A VPS that can easily - easily - scale to the needs of 100 people is "$5/mo". Looking cool and having brand recognition will indeed earn you money, but everything has its limits.

Cakez0r 11y ago
> Well, at the cost of "you reading the manual and installing it on a VPS" ... And managing and maintaining that server and backups of it. $2500 a year starts to look pretty reasonable when you consider the amount it will cost you to put one of your developers on to setting it up and maintaining it. Not to mention the peace of mind of not having to worry about disaster recovery.
- sytse 11y ago
  GitLab is easy to upgrade via apt-get/yum with the Omnibus packages. But if you want a maintenance free GitLab please consider GitLab.com or our GitHost.io service for single tenant hosting.
- toast0 11y ago
  Setting up is a real cost, but I manage users on our corporate github and our self hosted gitolite; for github, the user gives me their username, and I add it (after looking up my password), gitolite I add their public key to a directory and their username to a file and git commit; git push. Not a lot of difference. I don't worry about backing up the git repos, one of the promises of git is that every person who checks out the repo has a full copy, any of which we could use for a backup (helpful if we get a recent checkout). Third party hosting hopefully has a good disaster recovery plan, but the disaster could be your hosting provider quietly went out of business and everything is offline.
- x1024 11y ago
  Literally the only time I have had to administer my GitLab setup in any way was when my SSL certificate was about to expire. It's really very solid, and all of the user management can be done from the web front-end.
ceejayoz 11y ago
> Hosting a git repo and a very very basic issue tracker is so not worth $2500/year. It's $250/year per developer, which is a rounding error at most software companies.

by x1024 11y ago

Cakez0r 11y ago

> Well, at the cost of "you reading the manual and installing it on a VPS" ... And managing and maintaining that server and backups of it. $2500 a year starts to look pretty reasonable when you consider the amount it will cost you to put one of your developers on to setting it up and maintaining it. Not to mention the peace of mind of not having to worry about disaster recovery.

sytse 11y ago
GitLab is easy to upgrade via apt-get/yum with the Omnibus packages. But if you want a maintenance free GitLab please consider GitLab.com or our GitHost.io service for single tenant hosting.
toast0 11y ago
Setting up is a real cost, but I manage users on our corporate github and our self hosted gitolite; for github, the user gives me their username, and I add it (after looking up my password), gitolite I add their public key to a directory and their username to a file and git commit; git push. Not a lot of difference. I don't worry about backing up the git repos, one of the promises of git is that every person who checks out the repo has a full copy, any of which we could use for a backup (helpful if we get a recent checkout). Third party hosting hopefully has a good disaster recovery plan, but the disaster could be your hosting provider quietly went out of business and everything is offline.
x1024 11y ago
Literally the only time I have had to administer my GitLab setup in any way was when my SSL certificate was about to expire. It's really very solid, and all of the user management can be done from the web front-end.

ceejayoz 11y ago

> Hosting a git repo and a very very basic issue tracker is so not worth $2500/year. It's $250/year per developer, which is a rounding error at most software companies.