Errr, your argument does not make logical sense. The thing you would go after would be the adblockers for facilitating breach of contract. I don't see how you

Errr, your argument does not make logical sense. The thing you would go after would be the adblockers for facilitating breach of contract. I don't see how you could ever get to "a language then used to break the contract", nor is this a logical argument. Ie if you are using it to try to demonstrate some kind of absurdity, it doesn't work to do that. Facilitating breach is also not a thing, the closest thing is known as "tortious interference". Pretty much everywhere, it must be knowing and intentional (In the sense that you know it breaches that contract and are aiming it at breaching that contract). There are a small number of jurisdictions that allow negligence claims, but those jurisdictions are crazy.