3 ms·
So, it's very funny to look at some of the reactions here. For a group of people who seem to also think they would be great at self-study law ;P, most of them a
by DannyBee 11y ago
So, it's very funny to look at some of the reactions here.
For a group of people who seem to also think they would be great at self-study law ;P, most of them are mostly knee-jerk and come out to "i don't think i should be bound by this, so clearly the law says what i think" or "i think this is a bad idea, so clearly, the article is wrong", instead of making arguments based on actual law and precedent, or even something sane.
- chrhine 11y ago"I don't want it to be illegal, therefore it isn't. That's the way it works."
- CaptSpify 11y agoIs there a lot of current applicable law on this? It seems a new area in which the laws haven't really kept up, thus the disconnect
- DannyBee 11y agoThere are at least 40+ cases on it. Now: do those cases form some coherent set of rules? No. But there is actually a lot of law on it ;)
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]