3 ms·
I've said it before and I'll say it again: when law enforcement compromises the security of a network without a warrant, they need to be prosecuted and jailed u
by iamsohungry 11y ago
I've said it before and I'll say it again: when law enforcement compromises the security of a network without a warrant, they need to be prosecuted and jailed under the same law that any other hackers breaking the law would be. As long as there are no consequences for breaking the law, the NSA will continue breaking the law.
- cryoshon 11y agoThe US has a long tradition of not jailing its political lawbreakers, though. The way they pitch immunity in this case is to claim that a prosecution of an NSA official that broke the law would cause the remaining NSA employees to be on-guard for lawbreaking, and too busy to watching their ass to do their job at the NSA effectively, leading to terrorist attacks against the US. In effect, they say that it is unreasonable for us to expect the NSA to both obey the law and do their jobs. Nevermind that they've re-written the laws to make their invasive surveillance completely legal.
- iamsohungry 11y ago> The way they pitch immunity in this case is to claim that a prosecution of an NSA official that broke the law would cause the remaining NSA employees to be on-guard for lawbreaking, Good. Government officials should be on guard for lawbreaking.