3 ms·
It does not mean they didn't have a reason to get up in the morning, just that those reasons were unrelated to the business line they "worked" in. I have known
by gutnor 11y ago
It does not mean they didn't have a reason to get up in the morning, just that those reasons were unrelated to the business line they "worked" in.
I have known a bunch of such people, in a variety of mostly governmental jobs (but one high level banker too and even one in a tiny 5 employees company !). They were going to work like you go to the pub. They went to socialise, engage in petty status/influence wars, and indeed, there was this competition to see how to profit from the system.
And even then, all of that is relative. Money alone is a powerful reason to get up in the morning for the vast majority of the world. That's really a first world problem that you want to be paid to do something with meaning. Hiring people to do nothing all is routinely done in third world outsource centre. You keep team around for months before a project starts and you don't hear much whining.
- moonchrome 11y ago> It does not mean they didn't have a reason to get up in the morning, just that those reasons were unrelated to the business line they "worked" in. I agree - but it seems implied in the text (maybe I am misreading it). I would say people who actually want meaningful work are an exception not the rule - most see it as a way to get money. Which I am not criticizing btw. - everyone has their own values - I am just saying you shouldn't assume that people care about the work they do on their jobs (and I've seen many people idealistically assume it, even I believed it before I started working).