4 ms·
Substitute for meat, in texture and experience, or as an actual nutritionally-comparable food source?
by tcdent 11y ago
Substitute for meat, in texture and experience, or as an actual nutritionally-comparable food source?
- Alex3917 11y agoTexture and experience.
- RogtamBar 11y agoEven if it was price-competitive, what's the point? Do people really need to eat that much? And they'd have to get their calories elsewhere anyway.
- vidarh 11y agoThey're not devoid of nutrition, just not equivalent to meat. And most people in the developed world where most meat is consumed don't have a problem with getting enough calories, but getting too much.