3 ms·
> The problem is there is no coherent programme on how to counter the privacy-encroachment trend. IMO, there sort of is: FOSS I have my own "Alexa". It uses F
by CaptSpify 11y ago
> The problem is there is no coherent programme on how to counter the privacy-encroachment trend.
IMO, there sort of is: FOSS
I have my own "Alexa". It uses FOSS, and recognizes simple commands, like: lights off. Play/pause music. Add something to the grocery list.
Unfortunately, it's a lot less feature-full. I really want an Alexa (or the like), but I personally refuse to get one until I can run it on my own servers, and block it from getting on the internet. And unfortunately, that doesn't look like it's gong to happen anytime soon.
I think the big problem is the inability to run these systems without "big data" behind them, and I'm not sure what's the answer to that gap.
- lukeschlather 11y agoWhat verifiably private options are there for speech-to-text? It seems like they'd have to be FOSS but most of the "FOSS" solutions I've seen still use a remote server for the actual processing.
- walterbell 11y agoIt doesn't have to be FOSS, all you need is software designed to run offline, which can be network isolated, e.g. in a virtual machine. Dragon Naturally Speaking (from Nuance) in a Windows VM could perform the speech recognition and relay commands to a Linux VM. See also the http://www.voxforge.org http://www.voxforge.org effort to aggregate OSS acoustic models.
- CaptSpify 11y ago> It doesn't have to be FOSS, all you need is software designed to run offline, which can be network isolated, e.g. in a virtual machine. It depends on who you ask, some people may only be willing to run FOSS stuff |;) But yeah, I've looked for a "offline: FOSS or not" solution, and haven't found much. EDIT: I can't reply to you because thread is too deep I'm assuming, but: yeah, it looks like it does. Unfortunately I probably won't try this because it requires windows, and I'm not really wanting to set up a VM/Wine to accomplish this. But you are correct.
- walterbell 11y agoDragon works offline, http://venturebeat.com/2014/08/22/nuance-dragon-dictate-4-is-nearly-word-perfect-review/ http://venturebeat.com/2014/08/22/nuance-dragon-dictate-4-is...
- CaptSpify 11y ago> What verifiably private options are there for speech-to-text? Unfortunately not a lot. That's why I said it was "sort of" and answer. I've tried http://julius.osdn.jp/en_index.php http://julius.osdn.jp/en_index.php and https://github.com/cmusphinx/pocketsphinx https://github.com/cmusphinx/pocketsphinx in the past, with very limited results. Though it's been a while and they may have gotten better.
- dunkelheit 11y agoFOSS is from another era. Back then Microsoft were the bad guys and FOSS was largely a response to their hegemony. Ubuntu bug #1 was "Microsoft has a majority market share" and it is kind of resolved now but increasingly irrelevant. Now it is a different kind of challenge. True, if you are a geek, you can use open-source software to cobble together some resemblance of popular cloud services but under your own control. There are even detailed guides on how to do it (see also: https://github.com/sovereign/sovereign https://github.com/sovereign/sovereign). But that's a lot of nuisance and in the end what you get is an inferior version.
- CaptSpify 11y ago> Now it is a different kind of challenge. Howso? I don't see it as any different, but instead of Microsoft, there are multiple organizations. > FOSS is from another era. I'm not sure what you mean by this. FOSS is still current, and quite active today. In fact, I'd say even moreso. > But that's a lot of nuisance and in the end what you get is an inferior version. I agree. That's what I do now, but it's not nearly as good. But what I was implying was that we have the potential to create a much better version, that's trustworthy.