I disagree. For every Fedora release, the Documentation Project prepares a new version of the System Administrator's Guide[1] and of five other high-quality man

I disagree. For every Fedora release, the Documentation Project prepares a new version of the System Administrator's Guide[1] and of five other high-quality manuals. These manuals are usually up-to-date, accurate and comprehensive, and since they are maintained in the DocBook format (which is very superior to wikimarkup for technical documents), they can be converted into HTML (for the version on docs.fedoraproject.org), PDF (for printing or viewing in a PDF reader) and EPUB (so I can put the guides on a e-reader and read them comfortably). The documentation is even translated in multiple languages. Debian has documentation of similar quality, with the Debian Reference[2] and the Debian Administrator's Handbook[3], which is more up-to-date. Also in DocBook, and all I said about the Fedora documentation applies as well. This will not be a popular opinion, but I don't think Arch Linux's documentation compares to Debian's and Fedora's. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/System_Administrators_Guide/index.html https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/System_A... [2]: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ [3]: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/ https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/