3 ms·
Lack of package management There is no lack of package management. There is a lack of automatic dependency resolution without third-party additions. This is no
by vezzy-fnord 11y ago
Lack of package management
There is no lack of package management. There is a lack of automatic dependency resolution without third-party additions. This is nowhere near as debilitating as often presented by outside observers who have never tried the distribution.
YMMV, but I've ran into circular dependencies and conflicts in addition to configuration updates rendering systems unbootable multiple times on distros like Debian with their non-transactional resolution heuristics that make your life easier, until they don't. Slackware's spartan package management has not failed me once, it's rock solid no matter how much you thrash your file system hierarchy. In addition, when I want to install SlackBuilds, I have never used a more convenient package manager than sbopkg before. Dependencies can be cleanly recorded and built with queuefiles.
- jsizz 11y ago> I have never used a more convenient package manager than sbopkg before. Dependencies can be cleanly recorded and built with queuefiles. http://idlemoor.github.io/slackrepo/index.html http://idlemoor.github.io/slackrepo/index.html
- mlvljr 11y agoLet whoever wants downvote me, but I'd just like to bring people's attention to what your 2nd paraghraph says. ...to me it often is Ubuntu's apt breaking itself (and even reporting this back with cheerfullness I cannot understand) just in time for a save-home-dir-then-wipe-and-install-latest-ubuntu action sequence :)
- jqm 11y agoSo it does... I mispoke. But it isn't the same as yum or apt-get. (which is ok w/ me).