3 ms·
In the good old days of browser companies making browsers for the users (Opera up to 12.x) you were able to configure EVERYTHING per web address http://help.op
by rasz_pl 11y ago
In the good old days of browser companies making browsers for the users (Opera up to 12.x) you were able to configure EVERYTHING per web address
http://help.opera.com/Windows/12.10/en/sitepreferences.html http://help.opera.com/Windows/12.10/en/sitepreferences.html
localstorage, separate widget localstorage, separate userjs storage, Web SQL - you could limit/disable/define everything with fine granularity(disabled, quota, popup if quota exceeded) globally and per domain.
opera:config#PersistentStorage
Can you imagine something as crazy as letting user decide which sites are allowed to run Javascript? use localstorage? leave permanent cookies? use plugins? or something as weird as defining custom useragent string per website? All possible in Old Opera, No other browser will let you do that now afaik.
Today? Today you get Firefox forcing Pocket, Google serving Voice control binary blob, and all around people coming up with things that cant be fine tuned at the user level like webRTC. We are slowly moving to a point (wtf webassembly) to a point we will lose any control over whats flowing down the wire from the server and runs on our computers.
- dagurp 11y agoThe Vivaldi browser might be for you then https://vivaldi.com/ https://vivaldi.com/
- rasz_pl 11y agoNo. Last time I checked they didnt have 'preferences per domain' functionality :( Not to mention 100 tabs open in Opera 12.xx takes ~1.4GB of ram, Blink uses up to couple of hundred megabytes per tab. Not to mention the little things, like a proper tab configuration (minimize on click, close disable button), custom mouse gestures? Dont get me wrong, I still have it installed along with newest Opera, but they are my 'something doesnt work in 12.x' browsers.
- jacquesm 11y agoThank you.