3 ms·
Did you read the reason why vitamin D2 was chosen? Simply because it didn't contain animal products, not because it was any better. Similar for the Magnesium,
by puredemo 11y ago
Did you read the reason why vitamin D2 was chosen? Simply because it didn't contain animal products, not because it was any better.
Similar for the Magnesium, it was chosen for a neutral taste rather than based on bio-availability. Even though Magnesium Oxide is barely processed by the human body at all.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2407766 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2407766
- skybrian 11y agoIn general, I think it's okay to make design tradeoffs like that, because higher levels of vitamins beyond what you really need aren't necessarily better. But you could certainly ask them about it. I'm not going to get into it because this stuff gets complicated really fast [1] and two non-scientists debating it on the Internet gets silly. [1] https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Magnesium-HealthProfessional/ https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Magnesium-HealthProfession...