3 ms·
> As usual with these kinds of books, there is no mention of the work done by Muslim astronomers hundreds of years before either Copernicus or Kepler. Same log
by thrawy4567 11y ago
> As usual with these kinds of books, there is no mention of the work done by Muslim astronomers hundreds of years before either Copernicus or Kepler.
Same logic applies for the Arabic/ Islamic Golden age astronomers who were dependent on previous Indian, Greek and other mathematicians to further translate/ popularize , improve upon and invent what was the state of the art in those times.
Take a brief look at the wiki page for a continuity and cross-pollination of ideas across[1]. What matters is a conducive/ peaceful period where ideas flourish and new inventions are made.
The historic progression of ideas is thus: (remember, there will be ideas cross-translated across individual years within this broad sub-periods, and isolated inventions which were independently/ semi-independently discovered).
Babylonia (1800 BC) -> Egyptian (1800 BC) -> Greek (600 BC to 150 AD) -> Chinese (300 BC) -> Indian (200/500 BC to 1200/1400 AD) -> Islamic (1050 AD - 1400 AD) -> Medieval European (12th century) -> Renaissance (1400 AD) -> Modern Mathematics.
Also, see [2] for Al-Khwarizmi's On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals (ca. 825), and Al-Kindi's four volume work On the Use of the Indian Numerals (ca. 830)
> Unfortunately many Western historians casually ignore or at best minimize the impact the Islamic scientific movement had on many fields such as philosophy, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and astronomy. Instead they jump from the Greeks to the pre-Renaissance era.
On the same token, one might be making the same mistake if the Indian influence of the Islamic golden age thought process is not acknowledged. By reason, the influence of Greeks on Indian thoughts and so on and so forth. Please take a look at [3]
And lastly [4]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Hindu%E2%80%93Arabic_numeral_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Hindu%E2%80%93A...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_mathematicians#Ancient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_mathematicians#...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_g...
- Cyph0n 11y ago> Same logic applies for the Arabic/ Islamic Golden age astronomers who were dependent on previous Indian Yes, but bookstores are not filled with books written by Muslim historians. There is only side to the story being presented, and that's what annoys me.
- thrawy4567 11y ago> Yes, but bookstores are not filled with books written by Muslim historians. There is only side to the story being presented, and that's what annoys me. When you are annoyed that modern historians/ authors omitted - Islamic Golden Age (IGA) - in the history of Mathematics and directly jump from Greek -> Renaissance[0], you are only singling out IGA and not calling out the omission of Indian (Aryabhatta, Bhaskara et al - pls refer to [2]) or Chinese (The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art,Pascal's Triangle[3]) contributions. You might yourself be doing a non-willful omission and adding to the biases further. ("Greek -> IGA -> Renaissance" vs "Greek -> Chinese -> Indian -> IGA -> Renaissance") [0] which may have been true earlier but I don't think it's true anymore - as one comment confirms that US schools have it in their curriculum, also Indian schools have in their curriculum. As another commenter said, it's time to move on. In wikipedia, modern text books and elsewhere, this discrepancy is being/ has been set right and credit is given where credit is due. [2] Baudhayana - Śulba Sūtras- 800 BCE Pāṇini (c. 520–460 BCE) Aryabhata 476-550 CE Varahamihira 505-587 CE BrahmaGupta 598 CE Bhaskara 600-680 CE [3] Jia Xian - Pascal's Triangle - 1010 CE Zhoubi Suanjing c. 1000 BCE-100 CE -Astronomical theories, and computation techniques -Proof of the Pythagorean theorem etc.,
- Cyph0n 11y agoI'm a Muslim, so that's why I brought only the Islamic contributions up. However, I agree with you 100% that any region, religion, or entity that contributed to some field deserves recognition. Historical omission and/or rewriting is unacceptable in all cases.