FWIW xorshift1024* would almost certainly be faster than MWC1616 and it has no systematic failures on BigCrush. The only downside is that it uses more memory, b

FWIW xorshift1024* would almost certainly be faster than MWC1616 and it has no systematic failures on BigCrush. The only downside is that it uses more memory, but I think we can afford it. If not xorshift64* is also faster than MWC1616 and miles ahead of it in quality.