The article's tone isn't alarming, but I'd guess the OP meant alarmist, which kind of fits. The author's argument certainly doesn't present a clear path from t

The article's tone isn't alarming, but I'd guess the OP meant alarmist, which kind of fits. The author's argument certainly doesn't present a clear path from the inciting incident to any of the conclusions, so I also feel comfortable dismissing it. There isn't much use for emotional persuasive writing about technological issues outside of handwringing, and handwringing is boring to many of us.