3 ms·
> Notice we don't see calls for more surveillance after domestic shootings/terrorism. I think the reasoning is that in domestic school/church/theater shootings
by kzhahou 11y ago
> Notice we don't see calls for more surveillance after domestic shootings/terrorism.
I think the reasoning is that in domestic school/church/theater shootings, the perpetrator isn't engaged in long communications (and receiving instructions from) a leadership group.
- talmand 11y agoIt wouldn't be surveillance on you as part of a group, it would be on you as an individual. Most likely it would involve just enlarging the number of incidents or situations that would trigger a surveillance order on you. Doesn't matter, that type of surveillance will be incredibly easy in the near future. Whether we want it or not.