4 ms·
Perhaps the argument is that they couldnt keep a close enough eye on the "known perps". I feel like it is a fair/valid argument to support expanded/enhanced wi
by pweissbrod 11y ago
Perhaps the argument is that they couldnt keep a close enough eye on the "known perps".
I feel like it is a fair/valid argument to support expanded/enhanced wiretapping of those with warrants ("known perps"). One could argue either way if it is the person's right to know if they are on a watchlist.
I DONT feel like the argument for expanded/enhanced wiretapping for everyone is fair/valid. Aside from the fact that it feels draconian and cowardly, there isnt any hard data to back up its effectiveness.
- AnthonyMouse 11y ago> I feel like it is a fair/valid argument to support expanded/enhanced wiretapping of those with warrants ("known perps"). If the police have a warrant then they can tap your phone, bug your house, install a hardware keylogger on all your devices, etc. etc. That has been the case forever and nobody is objecting to it. The objection is to warrantless surveillance and mandatory backdoors.