5 ms·
I can't really find details on how this works. I assume the merchant still receives USD in the transaction along with the typical Visa card transaction fees. Wh
by esaym 11y ago
I can't really find details on how this works. I assume the merchant still receives USD in the transaction along with the typical Visa card transaction fees. Which in that case, what is the point?
- redblacktree 11y agoTo be able to spend your bitcoin balance without a manual conversion and bank transfer?
- loceng 11y agoLikely a considerably higher exchange rate + fee ... but hey, who cares when the people spending the Bitcoin are only spending it when it's likely only much higher than they acquired it for..
- ISL 11y agoThat only works if someone else is buying the bitcoin at the current exchange rate. Coinbase gets its dollars from someone to give to the merchant.
- loceng 11y agoRight, however I'm sure they can float a fair amount, holding onto Bitcoin until it's at a certain value again. So long as the scheme keeps growing..
- conception 11y agoYou don't have to hold dollars to spend dollars, is the only thing I can think of.
- flatline 11y agoCoinbase holds the dollars for you. It's arguable to what extent bitcoin even factors in here after your initial deposit, since everything is under the control of Coinbase. You are effectively holding a note called "Coinbase bitcoin" that fluctuates in value compared to the dollar, and you get a spot exchange rate when you spend. This is not the way bitcoin was meant to be held and spent.
- krapp 11y ago>This is not the way bitcoin was meant to be held and spent. That seems like a meaningless assertion to make about an unregulated currency. If the free market optimizes for regulated intermediaries, that's perfectly valid.
- flatline 11y agoI agree that it is valid for regulated intermediaries to participate. The notion of someone else holding your bitcoins, however, is anathema to the entire PKI behind the protocol. Someone else has your private keys, they own your coins, period. If they happen to give you access, good for you - but don't count on that access always being there, and not going away for good because reasons. There are other services that offer m-of-n signatures so that you retain control of your keys and a service provider can still facilitate transactions. Coinbase may even offer one of these services, I don't know. But the primary service that they offer is that of a bank - a non-transparent bank that may or may not have any quantity of bitcoin at any given time. Part of bitcoin's original stated intent was to circumvent this power of banks, particularly the power to run at a fractional reserve and pull "bitcoins" out of thin air, which works fine until it doesn't. And that is exactly what Coinbase and AFAIK most of the other providers in the bitcoin sphere are doing, with many famous scams, crashes, and losses along the way.
- anonymoushn 11y agoThis pretty much has to be done if Bitcoin is to have any significant number of users doing everyday transactions. The hilariously low transaction rate and long transaction times would otherwise prevent people from using Bitcoin to pay for coffee.
- abandonliberty 11y agoWow, that is terrible. The twisted people who came up with this deserve some respect given how they managed to get this on HN. "Bitcoin" all the things => Profit
- drcode 11y agoWell, one benefit I can think of is that keeping cash in a bank, just to keep you debit card funded, is a bad investment (I'll just ignore for now the question as to whether bitcoin is a BETTER investment :)
- s73v3r 11y agoTo be able to use BTC at merchants who don't want to deal with BTC? Like, buying groceries?