2 ms·
Why so? Surely, if the correlation is explicitly with leg power rather than endurance or general fitness, then anaerobic exercise (squats, deadlifts, lunges, le
by darkr 11y ago
Why so? Surely, if the correlation is explicitly with leg power rather than endurance or general fitness, then anaerobic exercise (squats, deadlifts, lunges, leg-presses, as well as running/bike sprints etc) would be the a better driver for building that power rather than aerobic exercise?
- datashovel 11y agoThat's why I wish they were more explicit when defining the kind of exercise the subjects were engaged in. My comment was primarily from personal experience. When I did my anaerobic exercise when I used to train, it was heavily anaerobic, where I would do a lot of short bursts of heavy lifting. Later I transitioned to primarily focus on aerobic, where I did a lot of distance swimming. So I think I had a good amount of both extremes to at least provide some insights. Everyone's experience will likely be slightly different. My hunch, though, is a lot of people who do lifting still get aerobic benefits because they're not training as intensely. So I think I'm speaking more about the extremes of the two types of exercise and not a middle ground.
- ScottGillis 11y agoI agree with you. This is a very good question to ask. If this is from extremely intense workouts, then I would say very few would benefit.