3 ms·

The author partook in hyperbole (I thought it was obvious that it was hyperbole.. but heh), but was referencing stuff like this: http://www.popularmechanics.co

The author partook in hyperbole (I thought it was obvious that it was hyperbole.. but heh), but was referencing stuff like this: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/news/a16532/america-crumbling-infrastructure-interstate-10-bridge-collapse/ http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/ne... http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/bridges/ http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/bridges/

Sanddancer 11y ago
The first article really is a fairly sensationalized piece on bridge infrastructure failures. The headline bridge, the one on I-10, was "functionally obsolete" because the guardrails were of a design that wasn't up to what modern bridges would have. The scouring that occurred because flash flooding isn't completely predictable, and washes can and do occasionally try to change course. The second bridge in the example was even worse. Someone died /demolishing/ a bridge. Unless I'm missing something, rebuilding a deficient bridge is kinda the opposite of neglecting infrastructure. Yes, there's an infrastructure problem, but the article in question just muddies the issue with near classic yellow journalism.